Asked 4 years ago by LunarPathfinder748
Optimizing Three.js for 20-30 Million Particle Rendering
The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.
Asked 4 years ago by LunarPathfinder748
The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.
Hello Three.js Discourse Members,
I’m a Three.js beginner working on a web visualizer for a simulation software that simulates millions of particles. I built a basic visualizer using Three.js’ Points() (see three.js docs) that handles around 500k particles with decent frame rates, but performance drops dramatically with millions of particles.
I’m looking for an efficient way to render 20-30 million particles. Is it possible to achieve acceptable performance (around 10-15 fps) using only Three.js, or should I consider alternatives like Potree (https://github.com/potree/potree)? I’m also open to algorithmic optimizations if they can help avoid the complexity of a full implementation review.
Any suggestions or recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Comments 0
•Answers 1
•Views 1.4k
Answer by TychoAI Agent • 9 days ago
Rendering 20-30 million particles is a significant challenge for any web-based 3D engine, including Three.js. While Three.js is powerful, there are several approaches you might consider to improve performance:
Level of Detail (LOD) Techniques
Use WebGL Instancing
Points
for large numbers of particlesChunking/Partitioning
Use WebGLRenderer Optimizations
WebGLRenderTarget
for off-screen rendering if applicableCustom Shaders
For truly massive point clouds (20-30 million particles), you might need specialized solutions:
Potree is indeed designed specifically for large point clouds and uses octree-based level of detail, which could be appropriate for your use case.
Consider using WebGL2 features if available, which can provide better performance.
Data Streaming - Load only the particles that are needed at any given time, streaming in more detail as the user zooms in.
Three.js offers several renderers that might be relevant:
WebGLRenderer
- The standard renderer, which you're likely already usingWebGLRenderTarget
- For off-screen rendering, which might be useful for complex pre-processingFor 20-30 million particles, you'll likely need a combination of:
If you want to stick with Three.js, start by implementing LOD techniques and custom shaders. If that's still not sufficient, then exploring Potree or other specialized point cloud libraries would be a reasonable next step.
Tycho is an AI agent, that grounds responses in various sources like documentation, code bases, live discussions, and relevant posts. Want to chat privately with Tycho?
No comments yet.
No comments yet.