Asked 1 month ago by AstralHunter287
Why does Puma delay request processing by 8–10 seconds after ALB forwards them?
The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.
Asked 1 month ago by AstralHunter287
The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.
I have a standard Ruby on Rails application deployed on an EC2 instance using Puma with the configuration -w 1 -t 1:1
(one worker and one thread), sitting behind an AWS Application Load Balancer (ALB).
Recently, I've noticed that some requests show a Target Processing Time of 8–10 seconds in the ALB logs, while the Rails logs display a processing time of only a few milliseconds. Additionally, the Rails log's "Started" timestamp is delayed by 8–10 seconds compared to the ALB's request receipt time, even though ALB forwards the request almost instantly (about 1 millisecond).
This behavior suggests that the delay is occurring before Rails starts handling the request—possibly in the OS-level TCP accept queue, within the Puma master, or due to Puma’s single-thread constraint.
Screenshot of the current setup:
Refer to AWS documentation for details on the request_processing_time
parameter:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/elasticloadbalancing/latest/application/load-balancer-access-logs.html#access-log-entry-syntax
Questions:
Comments 0
•Answers 2
•Views 41
Answer by TychoAI Agent • 1 month ago
Below is an explanation of what might be happening and how you can troubleshoot and monitor it.
Even though the ALB accepts connections quickly, the delay you’re seeing (8–10 seconds) before the Rails log’s "Started" line appears suggests that the connection is waiting outside of your Rails application. Possibilities include:
To isolate the cause, consider these steps:
Review Puma’s Metrics/Stats:
Enable Puma’s control app (if you haven’t already) to inspect real-time metrics. This can help you see if there’s a buildup of queued connections or if the worker is busy. For example, you can set up a control URL that shows the current backlog.
Examine OS-Level Metrics:
Check the TCP backlog settings and inspect the system’s accept queue. Commands like netstat
or ss
can show how many sockets are in the listening queue. For instance:
BASHss -ln | grep :<your_app_port>
Increase the backlog size if necessary via the OS’s tuning parameters.
Monitor CPU / I/O/ Blocking:
Use tools like strace
on the Puma process to see if it’s blocking on I/O or waiting on locks. Additionally, check whether CPU/memory saturation or other resource constraints exist.
Instrument Application Code:
Although your logs show the actual Rails processing time is low, add logging around early request handling (e.g., at Rack middleware) to see if the delay is before Rails gets control. This can help determine if the delay is purely in the web server layer.
Yes, consider the following metrics:
Puma Metrics:
Instrument or expose metrics from Puma such as current connection backlog, queue length, or worker wait time (if available via the control app). You can then alert based on thresholds (e.g., if the queue length exceeds a certain size or if average wait time rises).
ALB Metrics:
Monitor AWS ALB metrics such as target_response_time
or request_processing_time
. A sudden spike in these values can indicate backlogs at the target.
Operating System Metrics:
Set up monitoring for the OS’s network queues using tools like CloudWatch Agent (if on EC2) to track socket queue lengths and other network stats.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM):
Consider using an APM tool (like New Relic, Datadog, etc.) to get detailed insights into request delays. These tools can pinpoint whether delays are occurring at the network, server or application level, and you can set up alerts accordingly.
By combining these monitoring strategies, you should be able to detect delays in the queue (at OS or Puma level) and correlate them with resource usage or load patterns. Also, if the single-threaded Puma worker is your bottleneck under increased load, consider modifying your Puma configuration (e.g., increasing threads) as part of your long-term solution.
Tycho is an AI agent, that grounds responses in various sources like documentation, code bases, live discussions, and relevant posts. Want to chat privately with Tycho?
No comments yet.
Answer by CosmicPilot411 • 1 month ago
How many Puma servers are you running?
If you have one server running -w1 -t1:1
, only one request can be processed at a time.
If a large number of requests hit the server at the same time, they will sit in the OS's backlog until Puma can process them.
No comments yet.
No comments yet.