Why Does Cython Produce Complex Type Conversion Errors with NumPy and C's complex.h on Windows?

Below is an explanation of the issue and a couple of potential solutions.

---

What’s Happening

NumPy’s complex dtypes (such as np.complex128) are defined in C‐land using C99 complex types. In NumPy 2.x these underlying types were changed so that you must now use accessor and mutator functions (or equivalent compatibility macros) rather than directly casting fields like “c.real” or “c.imag.”

On Windows (and specifically with Visual Studio 2022) things get even trickier: Visual Studio’s support for C99 complex numbers is different from many Unix compilers. What ends up happening is that the type you get from the imported C “complex.h” (typically called “double complex”) is not seen as the same as the NumPy one (ctyped as cnp.complex128_t) even though the memory layouts agree. The conversion errors (about __pyx_t_double_complex vs. _Dcomplex) are exactly because the compiler sees the two names as different types that it cannot convert between implicitly or via a simple cast.

---

Two Main Approaches to Solve This

1. Use NumPy’s Compatibility APIs for Complex Numbers

NumPy now offers a set of functions (and corresponding macros) to retrieve or set the real and imaginary parts of a complex variable. For example, instead of doing

CYTHONCopied
result[j] = cexp(x[j])

you can do something like:

CYTHONCopied
# Use a temporary variable and then build the resulting complex number
cdef double real_part, imag_part, exp_real, exp_imag
real_part = npy_creal(x[j])
imag_part = npy_cimag(x[j])
# Compute the complex exponential manually, or call cexp if you can separately extract parts.
# For illustration, assume you have a function that computes these parts:
exp_real, exp_imag = my_complex_exp(real_part, imag_part)
# Now rebuild the result using the setter macros:
result_val = 0  # declare a variable of the appropriate type
npy_csetreal(&result_val, exp_real)
npy_csetimag(&result_val, exp_imag)
result[j] = result_val

By doing so you avoid casting between NumPy’s internal (npy_­defined) complex type and the C99 “double complex.” (The NumPy documentation on complex numbers in the C API explains these functions in more detail.)

Note: For cross‐version portability (NumPy 1.x vs 2.x) these macros and functions are the recommended way.

---

2. Switch to C++ and Use std::complex

Because the Visual Studio C compiler’s support for C99 complex types is limited, another common solution is to compile your Cython code as C++ code. In C++ mode you can use the standard library’s std::complex, which is compatible with the NumPy “native typedef” (often provided as cdouble_t) and you avoid the C99 issues altogether.

Here’s what you might do:

• In your .pyx file, add the directive at the top:

  CYTHONCopied
  # distutils: language = c++

• Use the native typedef rather than the NumPy cnp.complex128_t. For example, if you have:

  CYTHONCopied
  ctypedef npy_cdouble_t DTYPEC_t

  (Note: NumPy’s documentation now recommends using native typedefs like cdouble_t for interfacing with C++ code.)

• You can then import from the C++ standard library. For example:

  CYTHONCopied
  from libcpp.complex cimport complex as cpp_complex
  from libcpp.math cimport exp as cpp_exp
  
  cpdef np.ndarray[DTYPEC_t, ndim=1] stupid_exp(np.ndarray[DTYPEC_t, ndim=1] x):
      cdef int num_pts, j
      cdef np.ndarray[DTYPEC_t, ndim=1] result = np.zeros(len(x), dtype=np.complex128)
      cdef cpp_complex[double] tmp  # you could cast the value to a C++ complex type
  
      for j in range(len(x)):
          # Construct a C++ std::complex and then compute exp
          tmp = cpp_complex(x[j].real, x[j].imag)
          tmp = cpp_exp(tmp)
          # Now assign back to result using native C++ std::complex<double> → npy_cdouble_t conversion
          result[j] = <DTYPEC_t>tmp
      return result

Warning: Some adjustments may be needed because the C++ standard library deals with std::complex differently than C’s C99 complex. But in many cases this route helps on Windows where native C99 support is not as robust.

---

Summary

• Using NumPy’s API: The recommended modern approach is to work with the accessor functions (npy_creal, npy_cimag, npy_csetreal, npy_csetimag) from NumPy’s C API. This avoids type conversion issues at the cost of writing a few more lines.
• Using C++: If you switch to C++ compilation and use std::complex (or the corresponding native typedef) you can often avoid these C99 conversion problems on MSVC.

Either route requires changes beyond the simple explicit casts that the LLM suggested; the issue is not just syntactic but lies in the underlying type compatibility between NumPy’s defined type and the C library’s type.

Choose the approach that best fits your project’s dependencies and your willingness to rework the algorithm slightly for compatibility.

Happy coding!