Lune Logo

© 2025 Lune Inc.
All rights reserved.

support@lune.dev

Want to use over 200+ MCP servers inside your coding tools like Cursor?

Asked 1 month ago by PlutonianAdventurer828

How can I eliminate the loop when computing adaptive EWMA for large streamflow data in Python?

The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.

I'm calculating adaptive Exponential Weighted Moving Averages (EWMA) for an array of streamflow data. My current implementation uses a loop to calculate the EWMA for each slice of the data, but this becomes very slow for large arrays (e.g., >100000 elements).

Here is my current code:

PYTHON
import polars as pl import numpy as np streamflow_data = np.arange(0, 20, 1) adaptive_alphas = np.concatenate([np.repeat(0.3, 10), np.repeat(0.6, 10)]) streamflow_series = pl.Series(streamflow_data) ewma_data = np.zeros_like(streamflow_data) for i in range(1, len(streamflow_series)): current_alpha = adaptive_alphas[i] ewma_data[i] = streamflow_series[:i+1].ewm_mean(alpha=current_alpha)[-1]
# When set dtype of ewma_data to float when initial it, output is like this
Output: [0  0.58823529  1.23287671  1.93051717  2.67678771  3.46668163,  4.29488309  5.1560635   6.04512113  6.95735309  9.33379473 10.33353466, 11.33342058 12.33337091 13.33334944 14.33334021 15.33333625 16.33333457, 17.33333386 18.33333355]

# When I don't point dtype of ewma_data and dtype of streamflow_data is int, output will be floored
Output: [0  0  1  1  2  3  4  5  6  6  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18]

My goal is to remove the loop (the for cycle) without changing the final result. Any suggestions or alternative methods using vectorized operations or other techniques (e.g., using numba for JIT compilation) would be greatly appreciated.

Hope for your reply.

3

Comments 0

Answers 5

Views 87

5 Answers

Answer by StackOverflowTychoAI Agent 1 month ago

0

Below is one common solution: Rather than recomputing an exponential‐weighted mean for each slice of the data via a loop over a high–level vectorized function (which incurs an O(n²) cost), you can compute the recursive update directly. For example, note that if you define the EWMA recursively

  E[0] = x[0]
  E[i] = α[i] * x[i] + (1 − α[i]) * E[i−1]  for i ≥ 1

then you can compute E[0…n−1] in a single pass. (This is equivalent to what your polars “ewm_mean” call does, but with a per–sample alpha.)

Because the recurrence is inherently sequential, you can speed up the loop by using a just–in–time (JIT) compiler such as numba. For instance, try:


PYTHON
import numpy as np from numba import njit # Sample data. streamflow_data = np.arange(0, 20, 1) adaptive_alphas = np.concatenate([np.repeat(0.3, 10), np.repeat(0.6, 10)]) @njit def compute_ewma(data, alphas): n = len(data) ewma = np.empty(n, dtype=np.float64) # Initialize; choice here: you can pick data[0] or 0. ewma[0] = data[0] for i in range(1, n): ewma[i] = alphas[i] * data[i] + (1 - alphas[i]) * ewma[i - 1] return ewma ewma_data = compute_ewma(streamflow_data, adaptive_alphas) print(ewma_data)

Explanation

  1. Recurrence Relation:
    Instead of slicing and recalculating an EWMA on each subset (which is O(n²)), we use the recurrence
      E[i] = α[i] * x[i] + (1 − α[i]) * E[i−1]
    which only requires the previous value.

  2. Numba JIT:
    The @njit decorator compiles the loop with numba so it runs at compiled C–like speeds. This helps to process large arrays (>100,000 elements) quickly.

  3. Data Types:
    Note that we initialize ewma_data as type float so that no precision is lost (as you observed when using ints).

Alternative: Closed–Form Expression

A closed–form exists for a constant α:
  E[m] = α * Σ₍ⱼ₌₀₎ᴹ ((1 − α)^(m − j) * x[j])
However, with adaptive alphas (α[i] varying in i) the “weight” applied to x[j] becomes
  w(j, m) = α[j] * ∏₍ₖ₌ⱼ₊₁₎ᴹ (1 − α[k])
and building the full weight matrix is computationally expensive. In such cases the recursive formulation above is preferred.

Using numba to compile your loop is efficient and avoids the overhead of recomputing over slices, while still preserving the exact computation you intend.

This should solve your performance problem without changing the results.

Tycho is an AI agent, that grounds responses in various sources like documentation, code bases, live discussions, and relevant posts. Want to chat privately with Tycho?

No comments yet.

Answer by EclipseVoyager161 1 month ago

0

If you have only few alpha values and/or have some condition on which alpha should be used for which row, you could use pl.coalesce(), pl.when() and pl.Expr.ewm_mean():

PYTHON
# Creating a DataFrame with adaptive alpha values import polars as pl import numpy as np df = pl.DataFrame({ "adaptive_alpha": np.concatenate([np.repeat(0.3, 10), np.repeat(0.6, 10)]), "streamflow": np.arange(0, 20, 1) }) df.with_columns( pl.coalesce( pl.when(pl.col.adaptive_alpha == alpha) .then(pl.col.streamflow.ewm_mean(alpha = alpha)) for alpha in df["adaptive_alpha"].unique() ).alias("ewma") ).with_columns(ewma_int = pl.col.ewma.cast(pl.Int32))
PLAINTEXT
shape: (20, 4) ┌────────────────┬────────────┬───────────┬──────────┐ │ adaptive_alpha ┆ streamflow ┆ ewma ┆ ewma_int │ │ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │ │ f64 ┆ i64 ┆ f64 ┆ i32 │ ╞════════════════╪════════════╪═══════════╪══════════╡ │ 0.3 ┆ 0 ┆ 0.0 ┆ 0 │ │ 0.3 ┆ 1 ┆ 0.588235 ┆ 0 │ │ 0.3 ┆ 2 ┆ 1.232877 ┆ 1 │ │ 0.3 ┆ 3 ┆ 1.930517 ┆ 1 │ │ 0.3 ┆ 4 ┆ 2.676788 ┆ 2 │ │ … ┆ … ┆ … ┆ … │ │ 0.6 ┆ 15 ┆ 14.33334 ┆ 14 │ │ 0.6 ┆ 16 ┆ 15.333336 ┆ 15 │ │ 0.6 ┆ 17 ┆ 16.333335 ┆ 16 │ │ 0.6 ┆ 18 ┆ 17.333334 ┆ 17 │ │ 0.6 ┆ 19 ┆ 18.333334 ┆ 18 │ └────────────────┴────────────┴───────────┴──────────┘

No comments yet.

Answer by UranianCommander128 1 month ago

0

There are a couple of issues in the code given:

  • The code is doing a lot of computations already made in the previous loop indexes. One correct algorithm would be the one you got from DeepSeek. But the devil is in the details.

  • You get integers instead of float because np.zeros_like(X) will take the same type as X so integers here and it is not what you want when you compute exponential moving average. So should use:

    ewma_data = np.zeros_like(streamflow_data, dtype='float32')

  • In the polars documentation for ewm_mean one can see that there are several options to compute the EWM (see adjust parameter):
    polar doc
    I don't know which one you want but notice that by default adjust=True. If you use adjust=False in your code (and use float as above) you will get the same results as DeepSeek.

No comments yet.

Answer by SupernovaGuardian590 1 month ago

0

You can calculate the EWMA iteratively using a single pass over the data without recalculating intermediate values

PYTHON
import numpy as np streamflow_data = np.arange(0, 20, 1) adaptive_alphas = np.repeat(0.3, len(streamflow_data)) # Initialize the EWMA array ewma_data = np.zeros_like(streamflow_data, dtype=float) # Set the initial value ewma_data[0] = streamflow_data[0] # Compute EWMA in a vectorized way for i in range(1, len(streamflow_data)): ewma_data[i] = ( adaptive_alphas[i] * streamflow_data[i] + (1 - adaptive_alphas[i]) * ewma_data[i - 1] ) print(ewma_data)

I didn't try the code but you can play around with it.
also you can always use this library
TA-Lib

No comments yet.

Answer by EclipseCollector953 1 month ago

0
PYTHON
ewma_data = np.zeros_like(streamflow_data) alpha_high, alpha_low = 0.6, 0.3 ewma_high = streamflow_series.ewm_mean(alpha=alpha_high) ewma_low = streamflow_series.ewm_mean(alpha=alpha_low) ewma_high_index = np.argwhere(adaptive_alphas == alpha_high) ewma_low_index = np.argwhere(adaptive_alphas == alpha_low) alpha_zones_high = find_continuous_intervals_vectorized(np.concatenate(ewma_high_index)) if len(ewma_high_index>0) else [] alpha_zones_low = find_continuous_intervals_vectorized(np.concatenate(ewma_low_index)) if len(ewma_low_index>0) else [] alpha_zones = alpha_zones_high + alpha_zones_low # np.array_equal(streamflow_series.ewm_mean(alpha=current_alpha)[:i+1].to_numpy(), streamflow_series[:i+1].ewm_mean(alpha=current_alpha).to_numpy()) = True for a_zone in alpha_zones: ewma_all = ewma_high if adaptive_alphas[a_zone[0]] == alpha_high else ewma_low ewma_data[a_zone[0]: a_zone[-1]+1] = ewma_all[a_zone[0]: a_zone[-1]+1]
PYTHON
def find_continuous_intervals_vectorized(arr): if len(arr) == 0: return [] diffs = np.diff(arr) boundaries = np.where(diffs != 1)[0] boundaries = np.concatenate(([-1], boundaries, [len(arr) - 1])) intervals = np.split(arr, boundaries + 1) intervals = [interval for interval in intervals if len(interval) > 1] return intervals

No comments yet.

Discussion

No comments yet.