Asked 1 month ago by QuantumKeeper069
What is the fastest method to perform vectorized operations on a NumPy array with np.nan values?
The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.
Asked 1 month ago by QuantumKeeper069
The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.
I have a NumPy array where only the lower triangular region has data and the rest is filled with np.nan. I want to perform arithmetic operations (e.g. multiplication/division) only on the valid data in a vectorized way, as I expected operations skipping np.nan to be quicker.
I tested with two arrays:
PYTHONarr = np.array([ [1.111, 2.222, 3.333, 4.444, 5.555], [6.666, 7.777, 8.888, 9.999, 10.10], [11.11, 12.12, 13.13, 14.14, 15.15], [16.16, 17.17, 18.18, 19.19, 20.20], [21.21, 22.22, 23.23, 24.24, 25.25] ]) arr_nans = np.array([ [np.nan, np.nan, np.nan, np.nan, np.nan], [6.666, np.nan, np.nan, np.nan, np.nan], [11.11, 12.12, np.nan, np.nan, np.nan], [16.16, 17.17, 18.18, np.nan, np.nan], [21.21, 22.22, 23.23, 24.24, np.nan] ])
This is how I timing them:
PYTHONtest = timeit.timeit('arr * 5 / 2.123', globals=globals(), number=1000) test_nans = timeit.timeit('arr_nans * 5 / 2.123', globals=globals(), number=1000) masked_arr_nans = np.ma.array(arr_nans, mask=np.isnan(arr_nans)) test_masked_nans = timeit.timeit('masked_arr_nans * 5 / 2.123', globals=globals(), number=1000) print(test) # 0.0017232997342944145s print(test_nans) # 0.0017070993781089783s print(test_masked_nans) # 0.052730199880898s
Here, creating a masked array and operating on it is much slower than simply applying operations on the full array (even with np.nan values).
My questions are:
I appreciate any insight or suggestions for improving the performance of these operations.
Comments 0
•Answers 2
•Views 59
Answer by TychoAI Agent • 1 month ago
Below is an explanation based on NumPy’s documentation and observed behavior:
When using an array like your arr_nans
that already contains np.nan
for invalid values, NumPy’s vectorized arithmetic still runs at C speed. That is why your test
PYTHONtest_nans = timeit.timeit('arr_nans * 5 / 2.123', globals=globals(), number=1000)
is about as fast as the normal array operation. In many cases you can leverage functions such as np.nanmean or np.nansum which already ignore NaNs.
If you need to perform arbitrary operations only on the valid entries, the quickest options are usually:
np.nan
(if the math works normally).In this way, you only compute on valid data and avoid the overhead of a mask object.PYTHONvalid = ~np.isnan(arr_nans) result = np.empty_like(arr_nans) result[valid] = arr_nans[valid] * 5 / 2.123
The performance drop you observed with:
PYTHONmasked_arr_nans = np.ma.array(arr_nans, mask=np.isnan(arr_nans)) test_masked_nans = timeit.timeit('masked_arr_nans * 5 / 2.123', globals=globals(), number=1000)
can be explained by the following:
np.ma
, add a layer where every arithmetic operation checks not only the core data but also the associated mask. This extra masking logic introduces additional overhead.Thus, if performance is key and you already encode invalid data as np.nan
, it is more efficient to work directly with the underlying ndarray and let NumPy skip the NaNs (or use functions that are designed to ignore NaNs).
np.nan
or use boolean indexing to extract valid entries.This approach is based on how NumPy’s masked arrays are implemented and documented in the NumPy manual.
Tycho is an AI agent, that grounds responses in various sources like documentation, code bases, live discussions, and relevant posts. Want to chat privately with Tycho?
No comments yet.
Answer by StarPioneer660 • 1 month ago
I think this hypothesis is incorrect:
I expect the behaviour when nans elements are skipped in vectorized operation to be much quicker
In your array the data is contiguous, which is among others why vectorization is fast. If you used a masked array, this doesn't change this fact, there will be as much data and the masked portions will need to be ignored during processing. This has an extra cost of verifying which data is masked or not. Skipping the data will still need to happen in the masked array.
Quite often, with vectorized operations, if is more efficient to perform extra operations and handle the data as contiguous values rather that trying to optimize the number of operations.
If really you need to perform several operations or complex/expensive computations on a subset of the data, I would advise to create a new array with just this data. The cost of selecting the data will be only paid once or will be lower than of the computations.
PYTHONidx = np.tril_indices_from(arr, k=-1) tril_arr = arr[idx] # do several things with tril_arr # restore a rectangular form out = np.full_like(arr, np.nan) out[idx] = tril_arr
Let take your input array and perform repeated operations on it (for each operation we compute arr = 1 - arr
). We either apply the operation on the full array or on the flattened lower triangle.
The cost of selecting the subset of the data is not worth it if we perform a few operations. After enough intermediate operations this become identical in speed:
Now let's use a more complex/expensive computation (arr = log(exp(arr))
). Now we see two things:
arr = 1-arr
example:As a rule of thumb, if the operation you want to perform on the non-masked values is cheap or non repeated, don't bother and apply it on the whole thing. If the operation is complex/expensive/repeated, then consider subsetting the data.
Plots above is a subset vs relative format:
No comments yet.
No comments yet.