When Should I Use patch(), apply(), or update() for Kubernetes Job Objects in client-go?

Below is an overview of the three methods as they relate to working with Job objects using client‐go:

---

patch()

• What it does:
  Performs a partial modification of the Job resource. It sends only the changes (diff) to the API server using the PATCH HTTP method.

• How it works:

  • You typically construct a JSON Patch (or another supported patch type) that describes the incremental change.
  • It is best used when you want to update only a few fields without resending the entire Job object.

• Considerations:

  • You must take care to order your patch operations correctly so that you don’t inadvertently drop fields.
  • Client-side libraries that build JSON patches can help reduce errors.

• Example Use Case:
  Updating the active deadline or a single label on an existing Job without needing to fetch and resend the whole object.

---

apply()

• What it does:
  Uses Server-Side Apply to manage and merge the desired state into the resource configuration. This mechanism automatically calculates diffs and even deals with conflicts by tracking managed fields in the object's metadata.

• How it works:

  • You send the declarative configuration, and the server merges your changes with any previously applied configuration.
  • The operation is atomic and acts as a create-or-update: if the object doesn’t exist, the server creates it; otherwise, it patches it.

• Considerations:

  • It reduces the need for manual conflict resolution on the client side.
  • It’s generally recommended for more complex or collaborative changes where multiple actors might modify the same resource.

• Example Use Case:
  Declaratively updating a Job’s specification as part of a configuration management process. Client-go now supports using Server-Side Apply which makes managing field conflicts easier.

---

update()

• What it does:
  Replaces the entire Job object using the HTTP PUT method. You must send a complete, full specification of the Job, including fields that you might be otherwise leaving unchanged.

• How it works:

  • You first need to read the current state (including its resourceVersion) and then construct a full desired state.
  • The API server replaces the entire object with what you sent. Any omitted fields might be dropped.

• Considerations:

  • You must manually handle conflict detection (via resourceVersion mismatches) and implement retries if necessary.
  • There is a risk of accidental field drops if your client doesn’t properly include every field present in the object.
  • Full updates might be less efficient, especially under high contention or when the resource has many fields.

• Example Use Case:
  When you have computed a complete Job specification (perhaps as a result of processing or calculation) and want to completely replace the existing Job. This pattern is less common for incremental changes but can be effective for recreating a desired state from scratch.

---

When to Use Each

• Use patch():
  For small or isolated changes where you want to update part of the Job without the risk (or overhead) of sending the entire object. For example, updating a metadata label or annotation.

• Use apply():
  For declarative updates where you want the server to handle merging of configuration and conflict detection. It offers the simplicity of an atomic create-or-update, making it ideal for configuration management workflows or when multiple controllers might modify the same resource.

• Use update():
  When you have the entire current state of the Job available and wish to replace it completely. It requires careful handling of resource versions and ensuring that you include all required fields. This approach can be error-prone if part of the Job’s configuration (especially fields unknown to your client) might be unintentionally dropped.

---

Best Practices and Caveats with Job Resources

• Care with Field Dropping:

  • Using update() may inadvertently remove fields that your client code isn’t aware of (especially if using client libraries that decode and re-encode the object). Ensure that your full object includes all necessary fields.

• Handling Conflicts:

  • With update(), you have to account for resourceVersion conflicts. Consider implementing retry logic after fetching the latest version if a conflict is detected.
  • Server-Side Apply (via apply()) reduces much of this overhead by tracking managed fields and conflict resolution.

• Immutable Fields:

  • Some fields of a Job might be immutable after creation. Make sure the update or patch you send does not attempt to modify such fields.

• Choose According to Change Size:

  • For minor changes, prefer patch() or apply() to minimize the risk and overhead of full object replacement.

• Atomicity and Round Trips:

  • Server-Side Apply is attractive because it often requires a single round-trip and provides an atomic create-or-update behavior similar to an "UPSERT."

---

By understanding the differences and trade-offs between these three methods, you can choose the approach that best suits your operational needs and minimizes the risk of introducing errors when managing Job resources with client-go.