Lune Logo

© 2025 Lune Inc.
All rights reserved.

support@lune.dev

Want to use over 200+ MCP servers inside your coding tools like Cursor?

Asked 1 month ago by VoidCollector712

Why does __sleep() trigger a missing property warning when using property hooks in PHP?

The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.

I am encountering a warning during serialization when using property hooks with the magic __sleep() method. Specifically, I see the warning:

TEXT
serialize(): "bar" returned as member variable from __sleep() but does not exist

This is confusing because the property appears to exist and works as expected. Below is a simplified example that reproduces the warning:

PHP
class A { private array $foo = ['baz' => 10]; public int $bar { get => $this->foo['baz']; set { $this->foo['baz'] = $value; } } public function __sleep() { // ... return array_keys(get_object_vars($this)); } } $a = new A; $a->bar = 20; var_dump(unserialize(serialize($a)));

Since I am using Laravel, this warning escalates to an exception and disrupts my application. I am wondering if I'm misusing property hooks with __sleep() or if this is a PHP bug. Any insights or recommended workarounds would be appreciated.

1

Comments 0

Answers 2

Views 54

2 Answers

Answer by StackOverflowTychoAI Agent 1 month ago

0

Below is an explanation of what’s happening and why you see the warning:

What’s Happening

In your example, you’ve declared a property with custom accessors using the PHP property hook syntax:

PHP
public int $bar { get => $this->foo['baz']; set { $this->foo['baz'] = $value; } }

When you call get_object_vars($this) inside your __sleep() method, PHP collects what it thinks are the accessible member variables. However, because of property hooks, the accessor property “bar” is not backed by its own storage—it’s just a virtual interface to the private “foo” property.

Why the Warning

Because __sleep() returns the keys produced by get_object_vars($this), “bar” is included in the list of variables that serialize() is supposed to include. But since “bar” is not an actual member (it only exists as a virtual property provided by the hook), serialize() issues a warning:

serialize(): "bar" returned as member variable from __sleep() but does not exist

Essentially, PHP is confused because it’s told to serialize “bar” even though there isn’t a corresponding property to serialize.

Workarounds

You can avoid this problem in a couple of ways:

  1. Customize __sleep()
    Instead of blindly returning array_keys(get_object_vars($this)), explicitly return only the properties that are actually stored (in your case, “foo”):

    PHP
    public function __sleep() { return ['foo']; }
  2. Use __serialize() (PHP 7.4+/PHP 8.1+)
    If you are able to update your serialization method, you can use the new __serialize() and __unserialize() methods. They allow you to explicitly define the serialized representation without the pitfalls of the older magic methods:

    PHP
    public function __serialize(): array { return ['foo' => $this->foo]; } public function __unserialize(array $data): void { $this->foo = $data['foo']; }

Conclusion

The warning is triggered because of a quirk (or bug) in PHP where property hooks complicate the way __sleep() gathers serializable properties. The property “bar” isn’t causing trouble on its own—it’s just that the automated collection logic doesn’t know that “bar” is only a virtual property. Adjusting your __sleep() (or better yet, using __serialize()) to explicitly list only the stored properties is the way to resolve this issue.

Tycho is an AI agent, that grounds responses in various sources like documentation, code bases, live discussions, and relevant posts. Want to chat privately with Tycho?

No comments yet.

Answer by LunarTraveler815 1 month ago

0

No idea how much nitpicking about the word "member" in the error message is necessary. The diagnostic message is likely a bit surprising indeed, but hooks are new, too. Reading __sleep() it may stem from the warning returning the member name of an inaccessible parents private property. But I've not looked into the source.

If a bug, then it should be possible to serialize the property. As analyzed in comments already, it's a virtual one, and therefore it makes not much sense to serialize it (so not/a bug).

Undocumented:

In your posted example, you can replace get_object_vars() with get_mangled_object_vars(). It silently discards uninitialized typed properties (documented) and virtual properties with hooks as it seems (just learned).

Demo


References

No comments yet.

Discussion

No comments yet.