Asked 1 month ago by QuasarScout958
How Does HybridCache Manage Invalidation Across Pods in a Multi-Service Setup?
The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.
Asked 1 month ago by QuasarScout958
The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.
Microsoft.Extensions.Caching.Hybrid (available in .NET 9) provides a hybrid caching mechanism that combines in-memory caching for fast local access with a distributed cache (such as Redis) for centralized data storage.
In a multi-pod microservices environment, each pod uses its own in-memory cache. This raises a concern: if data is refreshed or updated in one pod, how can other pods invalidate their local in-memory caches to avoid serving stale data?
Currently, without custom implementation, changes made in one pod do not automatically propagate to in-memory caches in other pods. Is there a built-in feature in the HybridCache library that handles cross-pod cache invalidation or refreshes local cache entries in all pods?
Comments 0
•Answers 2
•Views 51
Answer by TychoAI Agent • 1 month ago
Hybrid caching in .NET 9 is designed to give you the fast, local access of an in‑memory cache while using a distributed cache (for example, Redis) as the centralized data source. However, the in‑memory portion is, by its nature, local to each pod.
Distributed Cache as the Source of Truth:
When you update or refresh data, the change is written to the distributed cache. All pods refer to this central store for the most recent value.
Local In‑Memory Cache:
Each pod caches data locally for performance reasons. This means that until an in‑memory entry expires or is explicitly refreshed, a pod may continue returning its locally cached data.
There is no built‑in mechanism in the HybridCache library that automatically invalidates the in‑memory cache in other pods when data is updated in one pod. In other words:
Without Customization:
Each pod’s in‑memory cache is independent. A change in one pod (even though it updates the distributed cache) won’t automatically propagate to already cached items in other pods.
Design Implication:
This means that if immediate consistency across pods is a requirement, you need to adopt additional strategies such as:
Shorter Expiration Times:
Configure the in‑memory cache entries with a short lifetime so they are refreshed at reasonable intervals.
Custom Invalidation Logic:
Utilize a pub/sub mechanism (for example, with Redis) or another signaling approach so that when one pod updates the data, it can notify all pods to remove or refresh their local entries.
The HybridCache library leverages the distributed cache as the authoritative data source, but it does not include any built‑in mechanism for synchronizing in‑memory cache entries across pods. In a multi‑pod setup, if a pod’s in‑memory cache might become stale, you’ll need to implement additional invalidation or refresh logic based on your application needs.
This design is intentional because the in‑memory cache’s performance benefits come from the fact that it is local. For scenarios where cross‑pod consistency is critical, make sure to combine HybridCache with an appropriate invalidation strategy or a tighter expiration policy.
Tycho is an AI agent, that grounds responses in various sources like documentation, code bases, live discussions, and relevant posts. Want to chat privately with Tycho?
No comments yet.
Answer by GalacticCollector688 • 1 month ago
But, want to see if there is anything handled for this usecase within the HybridCache library itself which could handle the multiple pods scenario well and data gets refreshed in each pod?
No, currently there is nothing of the sorts. This is covered in the docs in Cache storage section:
When invalidating cache entries by key or by tags, they are invalidated in the current server and in the secondary out-of-process storage. However, the in-memory cache in other servers isn't affected.
It would be even hard to workaround at the moment since the is no publicily exposed APIs to invalidate (remove) only local cache data since HybridCache.RemoveAsync
will clear both local and distributed cache. But if you are OK with rewriting local one via HybridCache.SetAsync
then you can create some pub/sub (for example on Redis) which will handle "remote" cache invalidation.
This issue is discussed in [API Proposal]: Cache Synchronization for Hybrid Caching in Multi-Node Environments issue at github.
Also you can look into FusionCache
which AFAIK already has such feature.
No comments yet.
No comments yet.