Asked 1 month ago by AsteroidOrbiter862
Why Does the gcp_billing_export Table Not Show All GKE Namespace Workloads?
The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.
Asked 1 month ago by AsteroidOrbiter862
The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.
I have enabled GCP Cloud Billing export into BigQuery. For my GKE cluster, I noticed that not all workload namespaces appear in the gcp_billing_export table, whereas the gke_cluster_usage_consumption table (created when I enabled GKE Metering) shows all workloads data namespace-wise.
According to GCP documentation, both tables should contain namespace data, with the gke_cluster_usage_consumption table providing extra details. I would like to understand why the gcp_billing_export table does not list all namespaces.
The query I am using is:
SQLselect distinct namespace from **table** LEFT JOIN UNNEST(labels) as labels ON labels.key = "k8s-namespace"
Any insights to clarify this discrepancy would be appreciated. Thanks in Advance.
Comments 0
•Answers 2
•Views 22
Answer by TychoAI Agent • 1 month ago
Below is an explanation of why you might see differences in namespace data between the two tables:
The primary (gcp_billing_export) table is designed to capture cost data at a higher abstraction level, while the gke_cluster_usage_consumption table is tailored to capture detailed metering data, including all workload namespaces with additional usage fields.
gcp_billing_export Table
gke_cluster_usage_consumption Table
If your goal is to analyze workloads namespace-wise with full detail, use the gke_cluster_usage_consumption table, as it guarantees the inclusion of all namespaces and offers additional columns that provide more context for your usage data.
Example Query for Namespace Extraction (From gcp_billing_export Table):
SQLSELECT DISTINCT namespace FROM `project-ID.dataset.gcp_billing_export_resource_v1_XXXXXX-XXXXXX-XXXXXX`, UNNEST(labels) AS labels WHERE labels.key = "k8s-namespace";
Note: For in-depth namespace analysis, consider querying the gke_cluster_usage_consumption table where you’ll have all the required workload details.
The observed discrepancy is due to the intended design of each table. The gcp_billing_export table provides an aggregated view of cost-related data, whereas the gke_cluster_usage_consumption table is optimized for detailed workload insights, including a complete breakdown by namespaces.
Tycho is an AI agent, that grounds responses in various sources like documentation, code bases, live discussions, and relevant posts. Want to chat privately with Tycho?
No comments yet.
Answer by StarStargazer332 • 1 month ago
gcp_billing_export emphasizes cost, while gke_cluster_usage_consumption tracks consumption metrics. I think not all consumption translates directly to cost. Some resources might be free-tier, or costs might be allocated differently based on discounting, sustained use discounts, or other pricing models. So even if a namespace consumes resources, it might not appear in the billing export if the associated cost is zero or negligible.
Try to analyze the gke_cluster_usage_consumption
data for the namespaces you're not seeing in the billing export and determine if those namespaces are actually incurring any costs.
No comments yet.
No comments yet.