support@lune.dev

Want to use over 200+ MCP servers inside your coding tools like Cursor?

Asked 1 month ago by MeteorResearcher539

How can I improve regex performance when scanning large files with multiple patterns in Python?

The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.

I have a Python script that uses a dictionary of precompiled regular expressions to search for emails, phone numbers, and dates in a file. However, processing large files takes several minutes. Below is the relevant code snippet:

PYTHON
PATTERNS = {  
    "email": re.compile(r"\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b"),  
    "phone": re.compile(r"\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b"),  
    "date": re.compile(r"\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b")  
}

def readfilecontent(filepath):
    with open(filepath,'r', encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore') as file:
        return file.read()

filecontent = readfilecontent("path/ToFile")
for key, pattern in PATTERNS.items():
    matches = pattern.findall(filecontent)
    if matches:
        for match in matches:
            print(match)

The script correctly identifies patterns in the file content, but its performance suffers due to scanning the file multiple times and handling a large amount of data. I’m looking for recommendations to optimize this process. For example, would combining patterns, processing the file in chunks or line-by-line, using parallel processing, or employing a specialized library (like Hyperscan) significantly improve performance?

Any suggestions on restructuring the code or using alternative libraries to speed up the regex search would be appreciated.

Comments 0

•

Answers 5

•

5 Answers

Answer by StackOverflow TychoAI Agent • 1 month ago

Below are a few strategies and examples you can try to improve the performance:

1. Combine Patterns into a Single Regex

Instead of scanning the entire file multiple times (once per pattern), you can combine your patterns into one large regex that uses named groups. This way you only scan the file once. For example:

PYTHON
import re

combined_pattern = re.compile(
    r"(?P<email>\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b)|"
    r"(?P<phone>\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b)|"
    r"(?P<date>\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b)"
)

def search_content(content):
    for match in combined_pattern.finditer(content):
        # Identify which group was matched by checking match.lastgroup.
        print(match.lastgroup, ":", match.group(match.lastgroup))

with open("path/ToFile", 'r', encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore') as file:
    filecontent = file.read()
    
search_content(filecontent)

Advantages:

Single pass over the file.
Fewer regex compilations and overhead.

2. Process File in Chunks or Line-by-Line

For huge files, reading the entire file into memory might be inefficient. By processing the file line-by-line (or in chunks) you can cache less data in memory and perhaps parallelize further if needed.

PYTHON
import re

patterns = {
    "email": re.compile(r"\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b"),
    "phone": re.compile(r"\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b"),
    "date": re.compile(r"\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b"),
}

def process_line(line):
    for key, pattern in patterns.items():
        for match in pattern.findall(line):
            print(key, ":", match)

with open("path/ToFile", 'r', encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore') as file:
    for line in file:
        process_line(line)

3. Use Parallel Processing

If you have multiple files or can logically split your file into independent chunks, using the multiprocessing module can help take advantage of multiple cores. For example, you might process different file sections in parallel:

PYTHON
import re
from multiprocessing import Pool

patterns = {
    "email": re.compile(r"\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b"),
    "phone": re.compile(r"\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b"),
    "date": re.compile(r"\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b"),
}

def process_chunk(chunk):
    results = []
    for key, pattern in patterns.items():
        for match in pattern.findall(chunk):
            results.append((key, match))
    return results

def read_in_chunks(filepath, chunk_size=1024*1024):
    with open(filepath, 'r', encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore') as file:
        while True:
            data = file.read(chunk_size)
            if not data:
                break
            yield data

if __name__ == '__main__':
    filepath = "path/ToFile"
    pool = Pool()
    chunks = list(read_in_chunks(filepath))
    results = pool.map(process_chunk, chunks)
    
    for chunk_results in results:
        for key, match in chunk_results:
            print(key, ":", match)

Note: When processing in chunks, be cautious about patterns that might span across chunk boundaries (e.g., if an email address is broken between chunks). You may need overlapping chunks or handle boundary conditions appropriately.

4. Alternative Libraries

Depending on your requirements, you might explore specialized libraries such as Hyperscan (with Python bindings) for high-performance multiple regex matching. Such libraries are designed for scanning large volumes of text with numerous patterns concurrently.

Summary

Combine Patterns: Reduces the number of passes over the full text.
Process in Chunks: Reduces memory usage and may enable faster processing.
Parallel Processing: Splits the workload across multiple CPU cores.
Specialized Libraries: Consider tools optimized for multi-pattern regex matching if needed.

Choose the method (or a combination) based on file size, pattern complexity, and available resources.

Tycho is an AI agent, that grounds responses in various sources like documentation, code bases, live discussions, and relevant posts. Want to chat privately with Tycho?

No comments yet.

Answer by EtherealObserver927 • 1 month ago

First start with instead of compiling 3 times try to combine your regex into one group.

PYTHON
COMBINED_PATTERN = re.compile(r"(?P<email>\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b)|"
    r"(?P<phone>\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b)|"
    r"(?P<date>\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b)")

This way it should scan your file content once.

And also further optimizing your regex with something like https://github.com/intel/hyperscan might be a good idea as well.

No comments yet.

Answer by NebulousRover931 • 1 month ago

Multiprocessing will likely not speed this up substantially since the bottleneck is likely file I/O. If the file is huge and you are reading it all into memory at once, your slow step might be the OS trying to find room for it all. It is usually faster to go line by line or piece by piece in these cases.

Given some massive file (ie, larger than what fits comfortably in memory) and multiple matches, you might consider using mmap and combining your regexs into one.

Example:

PYTHON
import re
import mmap

def regex_map_big_file(filename, pat):
    p=re.compile(pat.encode())
    with open(filename, "r") as f:
        with mmap.mmap(f.fileno(), 0, access=mmap.ACCESS_READ) as mm:
            for m in re.finditer(p, mm):
                yield next(k for k,v in m.groupdict().items() if v), m.group().decode()

pat=r"""(?x)
(?P<email>\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b) |
(?P<phone>\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b) | 
(?P<date>\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b)"""  

# example:
for m in regex_map_big_file("big_file.txt", pat):
    print(m)

Given this file:

BASH
$ cat big_file.txt
balh blah alex@acorn.org and his number is 415-515-3212 and last called him on 2025-12-25 
balh blah don@whitehouse.gov and his number is 212-333-4444 
balh blah james@phili.com

Prints:

PYTHON
('email', 'alex@acorn.org')
('phone', '415-515-3212')
('date', '2025-12-25')
('email', 'don@whitehouse.gov')
('phone', '212-333-4444')
('email', 'james@phili.com')

Another approach, given that all your matches are single line in nature, you can also just loop over the file line by line:

PYTHON
def regex_map_big_file(filename, pat):    
    p=re.compile(pat)
    with open(filename, "r") as f:
        for line in f:
            for m in re.finditer(p, line):
                yield next((k,v) for k,v in m.groupdict().items() if v)
# same usage...

Given this file:

BASH
$ tail file.txt
line 999995
line 999996
line 999997
line 999998
line 999999
line 1000000
line 1000001
balh blah alex@acorn.org and his number is 415-515-3212 and last called him on 2025-12-25 
balh blah don@whitehouse.gov and his number is 212-333-4444 
balh blah james@phili.com

(ie, 1 million lines then the short file above)

Each of these methods completes the file in <1 sec...

No comments yet.

Answer by PlutonianWatcher433 • 1 month ago

If you are processing a huge file with a relatively low proportion of matching lines, it is worth using grep to find the matching lines first, and then using Python to extract the information you want from each line.

Rationale: the Python and Perl regular expression engines use backtracking, with a push down automaton I believe, so processing regular expressions is relatively slow. By contrast, grep is much faster because it compiles the RE into a finite state machine before processing the input, and it's all done in C, not in Python.

I can use this command line on bash to process a large file ten times faster than in Python:

BASH
grep -E '\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b|\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b|\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b' file.txt

You could use that as a preprocessor before reading your file in Python, or you can use subprocess.run() to do it right in your script:

PYTHON
import re
import subprocess

PATTERNS = {
    "email": re.compile(r"\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b"),
    "phone": re.compile(r"\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b"),
    "date": re.compile(r"\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b"),
}

def readfilecontent(filepath):
    with open(filepath, "r", encoding="utf-8", errors="ignore") as file:
        return file.read()

# filecontent = readfilecontent("file.txt")
result = subprocess.run(
    [
        "grep",
        "-E",
        r"'\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b|\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b|\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b' ",
        "file.txt",
    ],
    capture_output=True,
    encoding="utf8",
)
filecontent = result.stdout

for key, pattern in PATTERNS.items():
    matches = pattern.findall(filecontent)
    if matches:
        for match in matches:
            print(match)

In my tests on a file with a million lines, like @dawg suggested, this takes 20% of the time compared to your original code, and has a much smaller memory requirement.

You can then further combine this idea with other answers here to process the text line-by-line instead of loading it in memory, for yet faster performance.

No comments yet.

Answer by NebularWayfarer571 • 1 month ago

3 + 1 Things to Consider when Optimizing Search with Regex:

I ran some analysis on the pattern that @dawg created. To see what happens. I searched a 1000-line text sample on regex101.com using six (6)
different permutations of the (email|date|phone) patterns. Please see the links below.
For comparison, I ran each of the 6 permutations in both Python and PCRE2 flavors. PCRE2 is used by Perl & PHP.

Here's what I discovered. I was especially surpised about the impact of the inline flag.

Here is an example of the six (email|phone|date) permutations:

PYTHON
# 1:inline-flag:    
pattern = r'''(?x)  
(?P<email>\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b)|  
(?P<phone>\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b)|  
(?P<date>\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b)  
'''  
  
# 1:re.X:   
pattern = r'''  
(?P<email>\b[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}\b)|  
(?P<phone>\b\d{3}-\d{3}-\d{4}\b)|  
(?P<date>\b\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\b)  
'''

Outcome:

Python regex flavor:

Inline flag average steps: 298,866 {min 297,777, max 299,995}
Regular flag average steps: 265,101 {min 264,012, max 266,190}
Difference between inline and re.X flag: 33,765 (exactly the same with every pattern)

PCRE2 regex flavor (used by PHP and Perl):

Inline flag average steps: 214,344 {min 213,255, max 215,433}
Regular flag average steps: 189,495 {min 188,406, max 190,584}
Difference between inline and re.X flag: 24,849 (exactly the same with every pattern)

All permutations completed in < 150ms.

What I discovered:

1) Flavor Matters: PRCE2 regex flavor vs. Python regex flavor

Python flavor, with inline flag ((?x)), had exactly 84,522, or average of 28.28%, more steps than PCRE2 flavor for each permutation.
With regular flag (re.X) Python flavor had exactly 75,606, or average of 28.52%, more steps than PCRE2 flavor for each permutation.

The processing speeds cut down in half using PRCE2 flavor vs. python. There were 40% (~77K steps) fewer steps using PRCE2 regex flavor than Python regex flavor.4
For large data sizes regex flavor can make a big difference.

2) Flag Type Matters !: Inline flag (?x) vs. regular flag re.X

For Python, regex with inline flag had 12.74% more steps than regular flag, exactly 33,765 each.
For PRCE2, regex with inline flag had 13.11% more steps than regular flag, exactly 24,849 each.

This means will have 11.4% fewer steps on average if you remove the inline flag and use regular flag instead. So, to optimize it makes sense to remove the inline flag and replaced it with the regular flag re.X.

It was interesting to see that it was exactly the same difference in steps between inline flag and regular flag for every permutation!
Inline flag is definitely busy doing something.

3) Pattern order matters:

The difference between most and least steps for permutations was within 1.0% for PCRE2 flavor and 0.77% for python flavor.

(email|phone|date) had least steps and (date|phone|email) had the most steps regardless of regex flavor or type of flag (inline or regular).

So depending on the size of the data, it may or may not make a real difference.

4) Pattern is matters:

I created this regex to capture simple emails (where extra dots are allowed), phone number xxx-xxx-xxxx, date xxxx-xx-xx. It did not have capture groups.
Updated: For python this pattern resulted in 106,853 or average 35.75% fewer steps than the average steps used in the six permutations (1-6) with named capture groups.

Use re.X flag:

#7:re.X [Updated PATTERN 7]:

PYTHON
pattern7 = r'''  
\b(  
    (   # Capture phone XXX-XXX-XXXX or date XXXX-XX-XX              
        \d\d\d[\d-][\d-]\d\d-\d\d(?:\d\d)?\b  
    )  
    |  
    (?= # Lookahead: go to the beginning of the email address                       
        \w+(?:\.\w+)*@          
    )  
    (   # Capture the email  
        \w+(?:\.\w+)*@\w+(?:\.\w+)  
    )  
)\b  
'''

Links to permutations:

NUM | FLAG | PERMUTATION | URL:

7 | re.X | ((phone/date)|email) | https://regex101.com/r/mP8v4Z/8 [Updated]

[EDIT: Corrected PATTERN 7 by removing the \b from the beginning of the lookahead and at the beginning of the email capture pattern. Updated comment 4 to match. Update link to pattern7]

No comments yet.

Discussion

No comments yet.

How can I improve regex performance when scanning large files with multiple patterns in Python?

5 Answers

1. Combine Patterns into a Single Regex

2. Process File in Chunks or Line-by-Line

3. Use Parallel Processing

4. Alternative Libraries

Summary

Discussion

Similar Posts

Why Does curve_fit Return Negative Parameters in the Debye–Callaway Thermal Conductivity Model?

How can I enforce the Ax ≥ b constraint in a nonnegative least squares problem using Python?

How can I efficiently count distinct chronological (a, b, b) triplets in a large array using Python?