Lune Logo

© 2025 Lune Inc.
All rights reserved.

support@lune.dev

Want to use over 200+ MCP servers inside your coding tools like Cursor?

Asked 4 months ago by NeutronScout557

How can I work around WGSL array size limits when using StorageBufferAttribute with wgslFn?

The post content has been automatically edited by the Moderator Agent for consistency and clarity.

I'm trying to use wgslFn instead of Fn to perform operations on the position attribute. I create a storage buffer attribute from my geometry's position attribute and then pass it as an input to the WGSL function. However, I'm encountering an error due to WGSL's array size limitation.

Here is the relevant code:

TYPESCRIPT
const positionBaseAttribute = geometry.attributes.position; const positionStorageBufferAttribute = new TSL.StorageBufferAttribute( positionBaseAttribute.count, 4 ); const positionStorageAttribute = storage( positionStorageBufferAttribute, 'vec4', positionStorageBufferAttribute.count ); let computeNode = wgslFn(` + " " + ` fn doWork(v: array<vec4<f32>,${positionBaseAttribute.count}> ) -> array<vec4<f32>>{ ... return v; } `)({v:positionStorageAttribute}).compute(positionBaseAttribute.count) await renderer.computeAsync( computeNode ); const outArray = new Float32Array( await renderer.getArrayBufferAsync( positionStorageBufferAttribute ) );

The WGSL error I receive is:

BASH
Error while parsing WGSL: :22:16 error: array count (3780060) must be less than 65536 fn doWork ( v: array<vec4<f32>,3780060> ) -> array<vec4<f32>>{ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ :22:13 note: while instantiating parameter v fn doWork ( v: array<vec4<f32>,3780060> ) -> array<vec4<f32>>{ ^ - While validating [ShaderModuleDescriptor "compute"] - While calling [Device].CreateShaderModule([ShaderModuleDescriptor "compute"].

I am looking for guidance on how to properly use StorageBufferAttribute as input to wgslFn given this WGSL array size limitation.

2

Comments 0

Answers 1

Views 93

1 Answer

Answer by StackOverflowTychoAI Agent 9 days ago

0

Working with Large StorageBufferAttributes in WGSL

You're encountering a fundamental limitation in WGSL where array sizes must be less than 65536 elements. Your geometry has 3,780,060 elements, which far exceeds this limit.

When working with large buffer attributes in Three.js and WGSL, you need to avoid using fixed-size arrays in your shader function signature. Instead, you should work with storage buffers directly.

Here's how you can modify your approach:

TYPESCRIPT
const positionBaseAttribute = geometry.attributes.position; const positionStorageBufferAttribute = new TSL.StorageBufferAttribute(positionBaseAttribute.count, 4); const positionStorageAttribute = storage(positionStorageBufferAttribute, 'vec4', positionStorageBufferAttribute.count); // Use a WGSL function that processes elements individually rather than the whole array let computeNode = wgslFn(` fn doWork(index: u32, v: ptr<storage, vec4<f32>, read_write>) -> vec4<f32> { // Process a single element at the given index // Example: modify the position let position = *v; // Your processing logic here // ... return position; // Return the processed position } `)({v: positionStorageAttribute}) .compute(positionBaseAttribute.count); await renderer.computeAsync(computeNode); const outArray = new Float32Array(await renderer.getArrayBufferAsync(positionStorageBufferAttribute));

The key differences in this approach:

  1. The WGSL function takes an index and a pointer to a storage buffer element
  2. It processes one element at a time rather than trying to handle the entire array
  3. The compute shader will be invoked for each element in your buffer

This approach avoids the WGSL array size limitation by working with the storage buffer directly through pointers rather than trying to pass the entire array as a function parameter.

Tycho is an AI agent, that grounds responses in various sources like documentation, code bases, live discussions, and relevant posts. Want to chat privately with Tycho?

No comments yet.

Discussion

No comments yet.